Instead of the old typedef Dim4TetrahedronEmbedding, you should use either the new alias TetrahedronEmbedding<4>, or the full class name FaceEmbedding<4, 3>.
Instead of the old typedef Dim4TriangleEmbedding, you should use either the new alias TriangleEmbedding<4>, or the full class name FaceEmbedding<4, 2>.
This method of using a hard-coded epsilon is very blunt. Currently Regina does not provide alternative methods for managing round-off error, though since Regina's computations are exact, this should not be necessary.
This method of using a hard-coded epsilon is very blunt. Currently Regina does not provide alternative methods for managing round-off error, though since Regina's computations are exact, this should not be necessary.
This method of using a hard-coded epsilon is very blunt. Currently Regina does not provide alternative methods for managing round-off error, though since Regina's computations are exact, this should not be necessary.
This method of using a hard-coded epsilon is very blunt. Currently Regina does not provide alternative methods for managing round-off error, though since Regina's computations are exact, this should not be necessary.
This method of using a hard-coded epsilon is very blunt. Currently Regina does not provide alternative methods for managing round-off error, though since Regina's computations are exact, this should not be necessary.
This method of using a hard-coded epsilon is very blunt. Currently Regina does not provide alternative methods for managing round-off error, though since Regina's computations are exact, this should not be necessary.
This method of using a hard-coded epsilon is very blunt. Currently Regina does not provide alternative methods for managing round-off error, though since Regina's computations are exact, this should not be necessary.